Shaw Capital Management Korea: Financial Markets

For most of the past month sentiment in the financial

markets continued to improve.

There was further evidence that the global economic

recovery was still on track, and short-term interest

rates remained very low.

But towards month-end the mood changed after the

decision to downgrade Greek debt to “junk” status, and

to reduce the credit ratings of both Portugal and Spain.

There was a fear that the contagion would spread still

further, and that the bond market pressures resulting

from the massive fiscal deficits around the world would

have serious financial consequences.

There was always the risk that some of the measures

that were introduced to counter the recession might

have adverse consequences, and this is now proving

to be the case.

Shaw Capital Management Korea: Major Equity Markets

After moving ahead for most of the month, most of the

major equity markets are ending the period unchanged

or slightly higher, and there have been sharp falls in

many of the minor markets.

Wall Street has been the exception, and is ending

higher, encouraged by some favourable corporate

results.

But markets in Europe, including the UK, are lower,

and there have been falls in the Chinese market, and

other Asian markets, after the measures by the

authorities to reduce the risk of over-heating in the

Chinese economy.

However views about longer-term prospect are still

fairly positive, and the markets seem to be simply

pausing until some of the uncertainties have been

resolved.

Bond markets; have produced a mixed performance,

with the major markets holdings fairly steady, despite

the worsening background situation, but with the minor

markets, especially in Europe, suffering very sharp

falls, and yield spreads between the stronger and weaker

markets opening up to record levels.

The threat of sovereign debt defaults has increased

and urgent action is needed, especially in Europe, if

they are to be avoided.

However there are also warnings that similar conditions

could develop in the UK and in Japan if there are no

early moves to reduce the level of fiscal deficits.

It is still expected that an aid package will be agreed

to avoid a default on Greek debt; but this may only

provide temporary relief.

Shaw Capital Management Korea: Currencies

Movements amongst the major currencies have been

relatively small over the past month.

However the weakness of the euro has enabled both

the dollar and sterling to improve as investors have

rushed to reduce their exposure to the European

currency.

There is a fear that the debt problems affecting Greece

and other countries in the euro-zone will make it

extremely difficult to restore the credibility of the euro,

and that it might make it necessary for some countries

to leave the single currency system, at least on a

temporary basis.

Shaw Capital Management Korea: Short-Term Interest Rates

There have been no changes in short-term interest

rates in the major financial centres over the month.

The Bank of Canada though has indicated that it is

considering pushing rates higher, and this has

encouraged speculation that other central banks may

be planning similar moves.

Shaw Capital Management Korea: Commodity Markets

Moved higher over the past month as sentiment in the

financial markets improved.

Shaw Capital Management Korea: Competitive tax system in UK

Now consider UK taxation. Already under this current UK

government tax, and stealth taxation in particular, has become the

soft default option. By the mid-2000s the top marginal rate of tax

including all imposts, whether on wages or consumption, had

reached 60%, the average tax rate was 40% and the marginal tax

rate on the average person 43%.

Now that the explicit top rate of income tax has gone over 50%,

the top rate has gone up to around 67%. So far for the average

worker not much has changed since the mid-2000s. However,

further rises in tax rates from these levels are not an option and

indeed they must be cut, for two reasons.

The first reason concerns the ‘Laffer Curve’; which computes the

extra revenue raised for every rise in the marginal tax rate.

This curve reaches a peak at some fairly moderate marginal tax

rate because of the effect on effort and tax evasion.

All informed observers, including the Institute of Fiscal Studies

which is generally in favour of higher taxes and redistribution,

agree that the 50% new top tax rate will not increase revenue and

will probably lower it for this reason.

The second reason concerns growth. Growth comes from the

innovative activities of entrepreneurs, who are extremely sensitive

to marginal tax rates because their activities are risky and any

gains uncertain; the more these are taxed the less the expected

return and if this drops below some threshold they will not bother

at all.

The UK needs both to make the fiscal

adjustment on the spending side by reviving

old-style Treasury control and then quickly

bring their tax system back into the land of

reasonable incentives, following that up with

reforms ‘flattening’ the marginal tax rates

across the economy and income groups.

Estimates of the effects on growth of marginal tax rates are for

obvious reasons uncertain; but the sort of effect that comes out of

empirical studies is an elasticity of one third, i.e. for every 10%

reduction in tax growth would rise by 3% (e.g. a reduction of the

marginal tax rate from 40% to 36% would raise growth from 2.5%

to 2.58%).

This effect seems small but it accumulates into something large.

So in short the UK needs both to make the fiscal adjustment on the

spending side by reviving old-style Treasury control and then

quickly bring their tax system back into the land of reasonable

incentives, following that up with reforms ‘flattening’ the marginal

tax rates across the economy and income groups.

The supporting role of monetary policy

This fiscal adjustment, however gradually brought about, is going

to be a fairly grim process and it will dampen growth further.

It will require the efforts of the monetary authorities to support

the economy through it, without pushing inflation over the target.

At present the bank credit is not expanding, whereas a growing

economy requires bank credit growth usually of twice or more

times the GDP growth rate.

The Bank of England is keeping interest rates low but has suspended

the printing of money (‘quantitative easing’), even though bank

credit growth has not responded.

But it may well need to restart it. This is something the UK will

need to watch and if, as seems likely, inflation falls back to well

below the target and the economy falters under fiscal retrenchment,

the Bank of England will need to take steps to get the broad money

supply growing again.

As we have noted before, other channels for money appear to be

working in substitution … UK equity and corporate bonds issues

have been substantial recently. So liquidity may turn out adequate

even without credit growth revival.

Our forecast for the UK

Though the UK Budget was predictably vacuous, being a pre-election

affair, our forecast assumes that action pretty much along the

above lines will be taken after the election by whatever government

is in power … hung Parliament or not.

The reason is that there is little room for manoeuvre and privately

in fact the parties do not materially disagree, except to some degree

on what modest room there could be for tax rises instead of spending

cuts.

So in short we think there will be fiscal retrenchment, monetary

policy will provide support, and so the UK recovery will slowly

continue.

Shaw Capital Management Investment Deadlock for Japan

The Democratic Party of Japan’s (DPJ) landslide victory in the Lower House election a year ago ushered in euphoric predictions of bold new policies, and even a transformation of the Japanese political system. There were widespread hopes that the DPJ would end the run of short-lived leaders. Instead, Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama’s tenure proved to be a slow-motion train wreck. Indeed, the DPJ quickly showed itself to be no more competent in governing Japan than its much-derided opponent, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP).

After shedding its two albatrosses of Hatoyama and general secretary Ichiro Ozawa, and many of its earlier campaign pledges, the DPJ hoped for a respectable showing in the last Upper House election. Instead, the ruling DPJ suffered a stunning defeat, when voters had the opportunity to show whether they were confident in Prime Minister Naoto Kan’s just over 1-month-old administration. The party ended with only 106 seats, far short of the 122 needed for an outright majority. The gap is too large to be filled by creating a coalition, because the most likely potential partners also lost seats.

As a result, the DPJ coalition can no longer ensure approval of its legislative initiatives. A twisted parliament portends even greater legislative stalemate and political gridlock. Gerald Curtis, a professor at Columbia University in New York and a long-time expert on Japanese politics, said the election had returned Japan to the paralysis and gridlock of the past few years. “You cannot pass a budget now in this political environment. You’ll have weak and unstable government. While the world changes fast, the Japanese government will change very slowly”. Trying to put a good face on the results, Kan said he viewed the election as a “starting point” for his push for a more responsible government ... The policy implications of the election outcome do not suggest an aggressive approach to monetary, fiscal or structural policy over the next few months.

Indeed, the attention of the large parties will most likely be focused on internal matters, leaving less time for focus on the economy. Gridlock is bad for the economy and for investor sentiment if policy drift continues for a prolonged period. According to Alan Feldman, managing director at Morgan Stanley in Tokyo, there are so many pressing problems in the Japanese economy that the costs of gridlock could be very high. In particular, pressure on the Bank of Japan for more aggressive monetary policy will likely be minimal, at least until political disarray ends. Without strong political leadership little progress is likely on budget priorities. The same goes for tax decisions.

At Shaw Capital Management we give you the information and insight you need to make the right investment choices.

Shaw Capital Management Investment Equity Markets 2010 Part 2

For the moment attention is focused on the strength of the German economy, and the beneficial effects that will be felt elsewhere in the zone; and there has also been a relaxation of tension about debt defaults, after the rescue package agreed by the member countries, and the intervention by the ECB to support the weaker bond markets. The German export performance depends of the maintenance of strong growth in the global economy that may not be sustained; and the odds still suggest that one or more of the weaker countries will at least be forced to defer interest payments on its sovereign debt, and may even default. The latest improvement in the markets therefore seems likely to need further support from Wall Street if it is to be sustained. The best performance amongst the major markets over the past month had occurred in the UK market. The measures announced by the new Coalition government to reduce the size of the fiscal deficit have been well received by the market, despite the fact that they will slow down the pace of the economic recovery over the coming months; and the latest estimate of a 1.1% growth rate in the second quarter of the year suggests that the effects of the fiscal retrenchment might even be less than had been expected, and has removed most of the fears about the possibility of a move into a “double- dip” recession.

The improvement in sentiment amongst investors is therefore easy to understand. Even before the announcement of the estimate of growth in the second quarter of the year, there had been further evidence of an improving economic situation. The unemployment rate fell; retail sales volumes rose by 1%, the strongest monthly increase in almost a year; and the latest quarterly survey from the CBI reported that manufacturing output increased at its strongest rate since 1995.

The 1.1% estimated rate was well above most forecasts. It was the result of expansion in both the manufacturing and services sectors of the economy. But the most surprising figure was the estimated 6.6% rate of growth in the construction sector that accounted for around one third of the overall growth in the period. It has also produced considerable interest regarding the reaction of the Bank of England to these figures. The bank has previously been mainly concerned about the risk of slower growth, and had even considered at the last meeting of its Monetary Policy Committee “arguments in favour of a modest easing in monetary policy” because “prospects for gross domestic product growth had probably deteriorated a little over the month”.

The mood will have changed now; but the governor, Mervyn King, has recently indicated that there will be no early changes in policy as a result of one set of figures. The background factors affecting the market therefore remain. Short-term interest rates will remain low, and the economy is performing better than expected; but the austerity measures that are to be introduced, and especially the increase in VAT in January, will depress demand over the coming months. It therefore seems likely that the UK market, like the markets in mainland Europe, will need further support from Wall Street if the recent strength is to be sustained.

The Japanese market is lower over the past month. There has been further evidence that the pace of the recovery in the Japanese economy is weakening; andthe poor performance by the ruling Democratic Party in the recent election seems likely to lead to a period of political uncertainty that will make it difficult for action to be taken to reverse the trend.

The earlier decision to introduce measures to reduce the massive fiscal deficit was a major reason for the government’s poor election performance in the election, and may well be reversed; and the Bank of Japan’s action to try to increase the rate of bank lending, especially to smaller companies, also seems unlikely to have much of an effect on the economic situation. The background situation in Japan is therefore very disappointing, and this is reflected in the performance of the equity market. It seems unlikely that there will be any early improvement in the situation, and so the Japanese market weakness looks set to continue.

At Shaw Capital Management we give you the information and insight you need to make the right investment choices.

Shaw Capital Management Investment Financial Market Summary 2010

Financial Markets: Sentiment in the financial markets improved considerably over the past month. There was less concern about the possibility of a move into a “double-dip” recession; and fears about sovereign debt defaults also eased.

The improvement in conditions intensified the debate about the relative merits of austerity measures and further stimulus in the current situation, and revealed a significant difference in the approach of the Fed and the European Central Bank.

Equity Markets: Most of the equity markets recovered strongly from the falls that had occurred at the end of June, helped by some encouraging corporate results in the US, and the relaxation of tension about debt defaults in Europe.

Wall Street led the rally, and markets in Europe were able to follow the upward trend, with the strength of the German economy providing significant support. The best performance amongst the major markets occurred in the UK, as investors continued to react favourably to the proposed measures announced by the new UK government to reduce the huge fiscal deficit. The worst performance amongst the majors occurred in the Japanese market as economic and financial conditions in Japan continued to deteriorate. Government bond markets received some support during the past month from the easing of tensions in the sovereign debt markets in Europe. The recent “shock and awe” support operation agreed by member of the euro-zone, and the decision by the European Central Bank to buy the bonds of some of the weaker countries, has provided some reassurance for investors; but considerable uncertainties remain about prospects for the bond market.

The Fed is suggesting that further stimulatory measures might be necessary, whilst at the same time the ECB is warning that reductions in spending programmes and increases in taxes were now necessary, in Europe, but also elsewhere in the industrialised world. Movements in bond markets have therefore been fairly limited over the month.

Currency Markets: The feature of the currency markets has been the swing in sentiment. This has allowed the euro to rally strongly, helped also by the improving sentiment about sovereign debt defaults; and sterling has also moved higher after the announcement of measures to reduce the fiscal deficit in the UK and the more favourable economic news on the UK economy. The best performance; has been achieved by the yen, as its “safe haven” status has been further enhanced by the more serious problems elsewhere in the currency markets.

Short-Term Interest Rates: There have been no changes in short-term interest rates in the major financial markets over the past month.

Commodity markets have benefited from the general improvement in financial markets over the past month. Significant gains have occurred in base metal prices, and in the prices of wheat and coffee amongst the soft commodities.

Precious metal prices have fallen back, and oil prices are basically unchanged over the month after rallying strongly from recent lows.

At Shaw Capital Management we give you the information and insight you need to make the right investment choices.

Shaw Capital Management Investment Equity Markets 2010 Part 1

Equity markets have rallied over the past month, sentiment has swung once again towards a more optimistic view of the prospects for the global economy, and concerns about sovereign debt defaults in Europe have eased.

Wall Street has recovered from the sharp sell-off in late-June, helped by some encouraging second quarter earnings reports; and markets in Europe have responded, with the UK market providing the best performance over the month. The worst performance amongst the major markets has occurred in the Japanese market because of disappointing economic news and increased political uncertainty after the setback for the government in the recent election.

The general improvement in the markets over the month is a welcome development. The gloom in April and May about economic prospects was clearly overdone. The US economy is performing as expected, and the Chinese authorities are clearly intent on preventing their economy from overheating.

The global economic recovery will therefore proceed at a slow pace. The sovereign debt crisis in Europe remains unresolved and defaults remain a real possibility. The risks have therefore increased in the bond markets, and this has provided support for the equity markets. So long as monetary policy remains supportive, the global recovery should eventually produce a sustainable improvement in bond prices; but some of the current uncertainties in the bond markets must be resolved before this can occur. The performance of the US economy remains the key factor is assessing the prospects for the equity markets. There has already been a request to Congress for additional spending programmes “to keep the economic recovery on track”, and although there has been no response so far, some action may become necessary. The excess gloom has disappeared, fears about sovereign debt defaults in Europe have eased, and there have been encouraging corporate results from a number of major companies, including Microsoft, Caterpillar, UPS, and Intel. Problems still remain in the banking sector, and have been reflected in the fall in earnings from investment banking at Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Bank of America, and JPMorgan; but overall investors have been reassured that corporations are coping fairly well with the present situation. Mainland European markets have also recovered from the sharp falls. There has been encouraging news about the economic background in the euro-zone; fears about sovereign debt defaults have eased; and the latest “stress tests” have only revealed weaknesses in seven of the ninety-one banks that were included in the survey.

Euro Markets have therefore been able to follow the upward trend on Wall Street, and regain recent losses, despite the uncertainties that have still to be resolved.

Conditions are clearly continuing to improve in many areas of the euro-zone economy, and especially in

Germany, helped by the big fall in the value of the euro in the first half of the year, and the strong growth in many of the export markets in the developing world. German companies have taken full advantage of the competitive currency and the available export opportunities, and so, even though domestic demand has remained relatively weak, the German economy is now expected to grow by around 2% this year.

The situation is very different in Greece, Spain, Portugal, Ireland, and even in Italy, and these weaker economies are obviously acting as a drag on the overall performance of the area. The latest purchasing managers indices for both the manufacturing and services sectors of the area are higher, and argue against a pessimistic view of growth prospects; but for the moment we have left unchanged our modest forecasts of overall growth around 1.5% this year. The European Central Bank is clearly more optimistic about prospects. So far it has not raised its growth forecasts; but based presumably on the assumption that the recovery from recession is soundly based and self-sustaining, its reaction to the present situation contrasts sharply with the cautious view of the Fed. The president, Jean Claude Trichet, is arguing that further public spending cuts and tax increases should be introduced immediately, especially in Europe, but also elsewhere in the industrialised world. “Without the swift and appropriate action of central banks” he recently argued, “and a very significant contribution from fiscal policies, we would have experienced a major recession. But now is the time to restore fiscal sustainability”. It is not clear what the consequences of this view might be; but the central bank might even be encouraged to tighten monetary policy as the present programme of fiscal retrenchment develops.

At Shaw Capital Management we give you the information and insight you need to make the right investment choices.

Shaw Capital Management Investment Portfolio Performance 2010

We have made no changes in our portfolios this month. The swing in sentiment towards a more favourable view of prospects for the global economy is encouraging, and has been reflected in the recovery in equity prices. We have therefore decided to maintain our holdings in Euro & US equities. We continue to retain our 10% holding in cash deposits as a contingency measure. The sovereign debt crisis remains a very serious threat, thus we have zero exposure to bonds.

World Growth

There has been much talk in recent weeks of a ‘double- dip’ recession, as some weak figures have come out. However wobbles of this type are fairly typical in a recovery from a severe recession. In our view the recovery remains in line with the path we have laid out before. This was for a world recovery that would be restrained by raw material shortages, which would put constant upward pressure on their prices. So we see world growth this year at around the 4.5% rate, well below the 5.5% figure being registered at the height of the boom; notice that the world is not ‘catching up’ the lost output of 2009, rather it is reverting to a slower growth path from the lower output base. Even with this pattern raw material prices have been very strong, with oil for example near the $80 a barrel mark. The rises in these prices forced China and India to tighten policy and restrain their fast recoveries to prevent inflation. Even now in India inflation is not yet under control, having reached 13.9% in May, and policy will need to tighten further. On a lesser scale inflation has become threatening in a number of emerging market countries. So what we are seeing is that the fast-recovering countries mainly in East Asia are having to restrain their growth. Meanwhile in the OECD countries where inflation remains muted … or in the case of Japan deflation remains entrenched; growth is much weaker than in East Asia. The reason for the disparity of growth lies in the disparity of productivity growth.

In East Asia the movement of people out of low- productivity agriculture into high-productivity manufacturing using the technology imported from advanced countries implies huge productivity growth. In advanced OECD countries productivity growth is dependent on innovation, a much slower process. So we observe a world in which productivity and so GDP growth is restrained generally by tight raw material supplies and in which the OECD countries growth relatively more slowly also. This adds up to a weak recovery in OECD countries, which is what we observe. The picture is not likely to change. It will take time for new technologies and discoveries to shift the shortage of raw materials; there are parallels here with the 1970s and 1980s when it took until the end of the 1980s to ease the acute shortages built up in the earlier decades. By 1990 for example oil per unit of real world GDP had roughly halved from the mid-1970s and oil prices fell to low levels. Nevertheless this does not mean that employment growth need be weak or unemployment remains high.

Labour market flexibility … i.e. real wages falling relative to general productivity and willingness to adopt new practices … can encourage substitution of more labour for capital and raw materials. This is most obvious in service industries where there is plenty of scope for higher labour-intensiveness. Furthermore, service industries themselves can grow faster when labour is more flexible.

So could this weakness turn into a double-dip recession in the OECD? It might seem so if growth there is restrained by tight raw materials and if also governments are pursuing fiscal tightening; the only way might seem to be downward pressure on growth. But this is to leave out the role of monetary policy. In the OECD inflation targeting has been the unsung hero of macro policy; inflation has stayed down in the recovery and deflation kept at bay during the 2009 recession.

The reason lies in the effectiveness of inflation targeting in anchoring expectations. Surprisingly also, many inflation expectations mirrored in wage settlements and bond yields have remained around the 2% mark, reflecting the inflation targets set by most OECD central banks or governments. But it should not be a surprise; the targets have reflected a popular change in overall policy, towards outlawing high and variable inflation. We had it, people did not like it, and policy changed to stop it during the 1980s or at latest by the early 1990s. In the debate over recession and public debt the idea that inflation should be used to tackle either problem has barely been discussed, let alone advocated in any serious way.

What this has meant is that monetary policy has been quite unhampered by the fear of inflation in its aim to keep recovery on track. With OECD banking systems mostly in difficulties credit growth has been held down  — in most countries it is hardly positive. So monetary policy has had to use unconventional means to encourage investment and consumption. Interest rates on official lending have been kept close to zero and central banks have aggressively bought financial assets from the public, with the effect that the yields on these assets have been reduced.

These purchase programmes have now been stopped. But if recovery looks threatened they can be restarted and will again have a powerful effect through these asset markets.

Two decades ago such programmes would have raised inflation expectations. Today they are given the benefit of the doubt. Some people argue that they are quite safe because bank credit and broad money therefore are hardly growing; however, one cannot be sure that other financial channels are not replacing banks while they are so weak.

The truth seems to be that firms and people who need finance are mostly able to obtain it on quite cheap terms, so banks are being bypassed to a substantial degree. But inflation is not expected to result because it is widely (and correctly) believed that if inflation were to start rising monetary policy would be tightened. This belief does free central banks to take aggressive action to prop up the economy if it falters. In short we think that the recovery will continue much along the current lines because from above it is held down by raw material shortages while from below it is held up by potentially aggressive monetary policy, with the power to more than offset the dampening from fiscal retrenchment.

At Shaw Capital Management we give you the information and insight you need to make the right investment choices.